cidroy logo

Perspectives / Blogs

5 minute read

Fulfilment Automation That Does Not Surprise Teams

Predictive maintenance for conveyors, sorters, scanners, and packaging lines to protect throughput and SLA reliability.

Why predictive maintenance matters in fulfilment

In high-throughput fulfilment, downtime is not a maintenance issue alone. It becomes an SLA issue, a customer trust issue, and a margin issue. Predictive maintenance is most valuable when it protects throughput during peak demand and reduces the operational volatility caused by breakdowns.

Assets that drive the most downtime risk

  • conveyors and sorters
  • scanners and dimensioners
  • packaging machines and labelers
  • robotics where present (with strict safety constraints)
  • control systems and critical sensors that cause line stoppages

Data sources and what is often missing

Automation equipment generates abundant telemetry, but the missing piece is often the maintenance linkage:

  • alarms and logs are not mapped to CMMS assets
  • interventions are recorded as free text
  • parts usage is not aligned to failure modes
  • time synchronisation between systems is weak

A successful implementation requires disciplined asset mapping and event alignment.

Modelling approaches that work in warehouses

1) Alarm pattern intelligence

Repeated alarm sequences often precede failures. Modelling alarm patterns can provide early warning and prioritised inspection tasks.

2) Performance degradation modelling

Changes in throughput, motor load, vibration, or error rates can indicate impending issues.

3) Risk-based maintenance scheduling

Rather than scheduling maintenance by calendar, interventions are scheduled by risk and operational windows.

Integration into operations

Predictive maintenance must fit peak operations. That typically requires:

  • risk-based work orders that are scheduled during low-volume windows
  • clear severity levels to avoid interrupting flow unnecessarily
  • evidence and explainability so operators trust the system
  • monitoring to ensure false positives do not harm throughput

Metrics that prove impact

  • reduction in unplanned line stoppages
  • increased availability during peak windows
  • reduced mean time to diagnose
  • reduced spare part emergency procurement
  • fewer SLA breaches attributable to equipment failures